AI NewsWiz investor unpacks Google’s $32B acquisition

Wiz investor unpacks Google’s $32B acquisition

9:06 PM IST · March 15, 2026

Wiz investor unpacks Google’s $32B acquisition

Googleclosed its $32 billion acquisitionof cybersecurity company Wiz this week — the biggest acquisition in Google’s history, as well as the largest ever acquisition of a venture-backed startup. On the latest episode ofTechCrunch’s Equity podcast, Rebecca Bellan, Sean O’Kane, and I were joined by Shardul Shah, a partner at Wiz’s largest shareholder Index Ventures. Shah walked us through his history with Wiz, which extends before Wiz itself — he previously backed Adallom, the startup previously founded by Wiz’s Assaf Rappaport, Ami Luttwak, and Roy Reznik. We also asked Shah about why he thinks the company was such an appealing acquisition target, and how he responded when Wiz walked away from Google’s previous acquisition offer. “It’s no surprise that it’s Wiz,” Shah said. “Wiz is at the center of three tailwinds: AI, cloud, and security spend.” Read an excerpt of our conversation, edited for length and clarity, below. Shah kicked things off by noting, half-jokingly, that we may have been underselling things by calling the acquisition one of our deals of the week. Shardul Shah:I think this should qualify as deal of the year or decade, not just the week. Can we change that? Thank you. But it is really important for the industry. This is the largest venture-backed acquisition in history. Rebecca Bellan:Yeah, we’ll work that out in post[-production]. Shardul:And more critically, it’s no surprise that it’s Wiz. Wiz is at the center of three tailwinds: AI, cloud, and security spend. And those are central today in light of the AI era where every single workload needs to be secured. So we’re super proud that we were the largest shareholder in the company. And yes, I think it’s at least [the] deal of the month. Rebecca: So how long has it been? When did you initially invest in Wiz? Because this is the kind of exit that I’m sure investors dream about. Shardul:Is it six years or 16, is a question for us internally. About 10 years ago, I joined the board of Assaf, Roy, and Ami first company, Adallom. So we got a front row seat at how they make decisions, how they develop trust and how that evolved over time. Assaf called me on my birthday when he started Wiz. And the seed round is when I joined the board. Anthony Ha:So, we’ve talked about this deal a couple of times before on the show, but because Wiz isn’t a consumer-facing company, I’m guessing some of our readers are familiar with it, some of it are not. Can you talk a little bit more about what it was — beyond just sitting at the intersection of these really important sectors — that you think made Wiz both an appealing investment and then eventually such an appealing acquisition target? Shardul:At Index, the core of our business is to focus on people. And I really think the core of the acquisition was the people. Assaf is this incredible leader who can make high quality judgment calls. He’s got great intuition about people and markets. Two of his co-founders, Ami and Yinon [Costica], are almost always in contention — Ami lives in the future, [Yinon] is very, very present and Assaf has the ability to really make a decision on which voice, in which moment, might lead the way. Roy is an execution machine. So together, they created this environment and culture of trust that allowed them to build a platform from the get-go and take on an existing category with unrivaled speed. Sean O’Kane:There’s this fun history — fun for us, especially because we got topush them on it at Disrupt a couple of years ago, where Google approached the company and [Assaf] actually walked away from the deal. In that moment, does that almost feel validating for you, as someone who feels like you’ve identified somebody who you truly believe in and is willing to take a step that I think a lot of people would be afraid to take, in the face of such a big, at the time, exit? Maybe not as big as now, but pretty close. Shardul:Not really. Some of it is probably because I’m irreverent and external validation doesn’t matter, despite my insecurity about you describing this as deal of the week. I did tell the founders at one point, I think I believe in them more than I believe in themselves. The first blog I ever wrote for Index was titled“Learning to Say No,”actually directed at the Audible founders. […] When founders choose and make decisions, you trust the inputs, like how they make decisions. You don’t really concentrate on the outputs and the luck that goes into whether it’s validated or not. Rebecca:How important was that in the acquisition of Wiz? Basically, that it’s getting what it can get from Google — funds, access to [Google’s] cloud, and more resources, but still able to maintain its own sense of leadership? Shardul:So to your point, maybe for the audience, Wiz aims to secure cloud infrastructure and code in production. Most of their customers are part of what’s called a zero critical club, they have the context to know what to prioritize and what to act on. Google’s resources, the infrastructure, the AI talent they have, allows Wiz to extend that recognition while retaining this culture of trust and camaraderie. Anthony:When we think about important acquisitions, they can be important in a number of different ways. They can be transformative for the acquiring company. They can also be transformative to the startup ecosystem because there’s a lot of people who are going to make a lot of money from this. And then that potentially starts whole new industries, whole new startups. So when you think about this as a big acquisition, what do you think are going to be the biggest impacts over the next few years? Shardul:I think it starts with inspiration. I think there’s a new imagination for what can be possible for entrepreneurs across the globe. And that’s amazing, right? I’m really proud that there’s so many people whose lives will change as a function of this investment, that’s really meaningful and fulfilling. But I think what’s more important is the talent, the skills, and the aspirations of entrepreneurs. So we can’t wait to see what the limits are for the next generation. Loading the player…

read more

Latest AI News

View All News →
GM just laid off hundreds of IT workers to hire those with stronger AI skills

GM just laid off hundreds of IT workers to hire those with stronger AI skills

General Motors has laid off more than 10% of its IT department, or about 600 salaried employees — in a deliberate skills swap: clearing out workers whose expertise no longer fits and making room for some with AI-focused backgrounds. GM confirmed to TechCrunch that it had conducted layoffs; they were firstreportedby Bloomberg News. In an emailed statement, the automaker framed the layoffs as a means to prepare it for the future, without providing specifics. “GM is transforming its Information Technology organization to better position the company for the future,” the company said. These layoffs are not all permanent headcount reductions. A person familiar with the layoffs told TechCrunch that the company is still hiring people for roles in its IT department, but for different skills. The most sought-after capabilities are AI-native development, data engineering and analytics, cloud-based engineering, and agent and model development, prompt engineering, and new AI workflows. In practical terms, GM is looking for people who know how to build with AI from the ground up — designing the systems, training the models, and engineering the pipelines — not just use AI as a productivity tool. GM has laid off white-collar employees in several departments over the past 18 months, as it focuses its resources on high-priority initiatives, including AI. In August 2024, for example, the company cut about1,000 software workers. The software workforce has undergone significant change since Sterling Anderson — co-founder of the autonomous trucking startup Aurora and a veteran of the autonomous vehicle industry — was hired in May 2025 aschief product officer. Last November,three top executivesleft the company’s software team as Anderson pushed to consolidate GM’s disparate technology businesses into one organization: Baris Cetinok, senior vice president of software and services product management; Dave Richardson, senior vice president of software and services engineering; and Barak Turovsky, a former VP at Cisco who spent just nine months as GM’s chief AI officer. GM has since moved to fill the gap with new AI-focused hires. It hired Behrad Toghi, who previously worked at Apple, in October as AI lead. The company also brought on Rashed Haq as its vice president of autonomous vehicles. Haq spent five years at Cruise — the self-driving vehicle company acquired and later shuttered by GM — as its head of AI and robotics. For the industry, GM's restructuring is a signal of what enterprise AI adoption actually looks like in practice -- not just adding AI tools on top of existing teams, but deliberately rebuilding the workforce from the ground up. The specific capabilities it's hiring for -- agent development, model engineering, AI-native workflows -- point directly at where large-enterprise demand is heading.

2 hours ago

View

Thinking Machines wants to build an AI that actually listens while it talks

Thinking Machines wants to build an AI that actually listens while it talks

Thinking Machines Lab, the AI startup founded last year by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati, on Monday announced something calledinteraction models, which, at its essence, sounds like AI that can interrupt you. Right now, every AI model you’ve ever used works the same way. You talk, it listens. It responds, you listen. Thinking Machines is trying to change that by building a model that processes your input and generates a response at the same time, so it’s more like a phone call than a text chain. The technical term for this is “full duplex,” and the company claims its model, TML-Interaction-Small, responds in 0.40 seconds, which is roughly the speed of natural human conversation and significantly faster than comparable models from OpenAI and Google. Still, this is a research preview, not a product. The company isn’t releasing it to the public yet. A “limited research preview” is coming in the next few months, it says, with a wider release set for later this year. So what to make of it? We’re not sure. Thebenchmarksare impressive and the underlying idea — that interactivity should be native to a model, not bolted on — is definitely interesting. Whether the real-world experience lives up to the technical claims is something we won’t know until people can actually use it.

2 hours ago

View

Ilya Sutskever Reveals $7 Bn OpenAI Stake While Accusing Sam Altman of Dishonesty

Ilya Sutskever Reveals $7 Bn OpenAI Stake While Accusing Sam Altman of Dishonesty

Sutskever also confirmed that after Altman’s temporary ouster, OpenAI board members held discussions with Anthropic regarding a possible merger.

2 hours ago

View

Riding an AI rally, Robinhood preps second retail venture IPO

Riding an AI rally, Robinhood preps second retail venture IPO

Just two months after listing its first venture fund on the stock market, Robinhood is preparing to launch a second. The company hasfiled aconfidential registrationfor RVII, a standard regulatory step that allows it to work through the approval process before making details public. Unlike its first fund, which currently holds stakes in10 late-stage companies— Airwallex, Boom, Databricks, ElevenLabs, Mercor, OpenAI, Oura, Ramp, Revolut, and Stripe— RVII will cast a wider net, investing in growth-stage and early-stage startups.It’s a meaningful distinction, given that early-stage startups are younger and carry more risk but also offer the potential for greater returns. The fundraising target for RVII has not yet been set, the company said in ablog post. For its inaugural fund, Robinhood sought to raise $1 billion but ultimately fellseveral hundred million shortof that goal. Despite the shortfall, the first fund has performed strongly. RVI — the ticker for Robinhood’s first fund, which trades on the NYSE (New York Stock Exchange) — debuting on the NYSE at $21 a share in early March and has since more than doubled, closing on Monday at $43.69. Market enthusiasm for the AI prospects of the fund’s underlying startups has likely fueled the stock’s rise. The premise behind both funds addresses a longstanding gap in who gets to invest in startups. Under federal rules, only “accredited” investors — those with a net worth exceeding $1 million or annual income above $200,000 — can put money into private companies. That has historically locked ordinary investors out of the earliest and most lucrative stages of a company’s growth. RVI and now RVII, are designed to change that, letting anyone invest in a portfolio of private startups through a regular brokerage account. “You can think of [Robinhood Ventures] as a publicly traded venture capital firm with daily liquidity. No accreditation requirements and no carry,” Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev said in aninterviewat The Wall Street Journal’s Future of Everything conference last week. Daily liquidity means shares can be bought or sold any day the market is open, unlike traditional VC funds, where capital is locked up for years. No carry means Robinhood doesn’t take a percentage of investment profits, as conventional venture firms typically do. Over the past few years, the most valuable AI startups have gone from early bets to companies worth tens or hundreds of billions of dollars, and almost all of that appreciation has happened in the private markets, out of reach for most investors. Tenev's longer-term vision goes further still. “The aspiration is, if you’re a company raising a seed round and a Series A round — so, just first capital — retail should be a big chunk of that round, much like it now is in the public markets,” Tenevsaid at the conference. “And we should let those people in at the ground floor, so that they can actually benefit from this potential appreciation that’s increasingly happening in the private markets.” If that vision takes hold, it could fundamentally change how startups raise their earliest capital, with retail investors eventually sitting alongside venture firms, including in the earliest rounds, where the biggest returns are often made, a whole lot of money is lost, as well.

6 hours ago

View