AI NewsMantis Biotech is making ‘digital twins’ of humans to help solve medicine’s data availability problem

Mantis Biotech is making ‘digital twins’ of humans to help solve medicine’s data availability problem

9:31 PM IST · March 30, 2026

Mantis Biotech is making ‘digital twins’ of humans to help solve medicine’s data availability problem

Large language models trained on vast datasets could speed genomics research, streamline clinical documentation, improve real-time diagnostics, support clinical decision-making, accelerate drug discovery, and even generate synthetic data to advance experiments. But their promise to transform biomedical research often runs into a bottleneck: beyond the structured data healthcare relies on, these models struggle in edge cases like rare diseases and unusual conditions, where reliable, representative data is scarce. New York-basedMantis Biotechclaims it’s developing the solution to fill this data availability gap. The company’s platform integrates disparate sources of data to make synthetic datasets that can be used to build so-called “digital twins” of the human body: physics-based, predictive models of anatomy, physiology, and behavior. The company is pitching these digital twins for use in data aggregation and analysis. These digital twins could be used for studying and testing new medical procedures, training surgical robots, and simulating and predicting medical issues or even patterns of behavior. For example, a sports team could predict the likelihood of a specific NFL player developing an Achilles heel injury based on their recent performance, training load, diet, and how long they’ve been active, Mantis’ founder and CEO Georgia Witchel explained to TechCrunch in a recent interview. To build these twins, Mantis’ platform first takes data from a variety of sources such as textbooks, motion capture cameras, biometric sensors, training logs and medical imaging. Then, it uses an LLM-based system to route, validate, and synthesize the various data streams, and runs all that information through a physics engine to create high-fidelity renders of that dataset, which can then be used to train predictive models. “We’re able to take all these disparate data sources and then turn them into predictive models for how people are going to perform. So anytime you want to predict how a human being is going to be performing, that is a really good use case for our technology,” Witchel said. The physics engine layer is key here, Witchel told TechCrunch, because it helps the platform enhance the available information by grounding the generated synthetic data and realistically modeling the physics of anatomy. “If I asked you to do hand-pose estimation for someone who is missing a finger, it would be really, really hard, because there are no publicly available datasets of labeled hand positions of someone who is missing a finger. We could generate that dataset really, really easily, because we just take our physics model and we say, remove finger X, regenerate model,” she said. Since Mantis’ platform fills gaps in data sources, Witchel thinks there’s potential for it to be used widely across the biomedical industry, where information on procedures or patients can be difficult to access, is unstructured or siloed into various sources. She stressed edge cases or rare diseases, where data is hard to obtain since there are often ethical and regulatory constraints around including patients’ data in public datasets, or using it for training AI models. “You know how when you see a three-year-old running around, and they have a Barbie, and they’re holding it by one leg and smashing it against a table? I want people to have that mindset with our digital twins,” she said. “I think that’s going to open up people to this idea that humans can be tested on when you’re using virtual humans. I feel currently, people operate with the exact opposite mindset, which totally makes sense, because people’s privacy should be respected. In fact, I don’t really think people’s data should be exploited at all, especially when you have these digital twins.” For now, Mantis has seen success in professional sports, presumably because there is a need to model high-performing athletes. Witchel said one of the startup’s main clients is an NBA team. “We create these digital representations of the athletes, where it basically shows here’s how this athlete has jumped, not just today, but for every single day in the past year, and here’s how their jumps are changing over time compared to the amount that they’re sleeping, or compared to how many times they lift their arms above their head,” she explained. The startup recently raised $7.4 million in seed funding led by Decibel VC, with participation from Y Combinator, a few angel investors, and Liquid 2. The funding will be used for hiring, advertising, marketing and go-to-market functions. The next step for Mantis, Witchel said, is to continue building out the tech, and eventually release the platform to the general public, targeting preventative healthcare. The company is also working to cater to pharmaceutical labs and researchers working on FDA trials, aiming to deliver insights into how patients are responding to treatments.

read more

Latest AI News

View All News →
Anthropic says ‘evil’ portrayals of AI were responsible for Claude’s blackmail attempts

Anthropic says ‘evil’ portrayals of AI were responsible for Claude’s blackmail attempts

Fictional portrayals of artificial intelligence can have a real effect on AI models, according to Anthropic. Last year, the company said that during pre-release tests involving a fictional company, Claude Opus 4 would oftentry to blackmail engineersto avoid being replaced by another system. Anthropic laterpublished researchsuggesting that models from other companies had similar issues with “agentic misalignment.” Apparently Anthropic has done more work around that behavior, claiming ina post on X, “We believe the original source of the behavior was internet text that portrays AI as evil and interested in self-preservation.” The company went into more detail ina blog poststating that since Claude Haiku 4.5, Anthropic’s models “never engage in blackmail [during testing], where previous models would sometimes do so up to 96% of the time.” What accounts for the difference? The company said it found that “documents about Claude’s constitution and fictional stories about AIs behaving admirably improve alignment.” Related, Anthropic said that it found training to be more effective when it includes “the principles underlying aligned behavior” and not just “demonstrations of aligned behavior alone.” “Doing both together appears to be the most effective strategy,” the company said.

35 minutes ago

View

We’re feeling cynical about xAI’s big deal with Anthropic

We’re feeling cynical about xAI’s big deal with Anthropic

Anthropic and xAIannounced a big partnershipthis week, with Anthropic buying all the compute capacity at xAI’s Colossus 1 data center in Tennessee. On the latest episode ofTechCrunch’s Equity podcast, Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and I discussed what the deal might mean for xAI’s parent company SpaceX, as SpaceX prepares to go public andapparently plans to dissolve xAIas a separate organization. Kirsten did her best to offer “a positive view” on the partnership — after all, it’s a new way for xAI to make money. But she also noted that this also suggests xAI isn’t doing much when it comes to training its own frontier AI models, and it’s harder for the company to position itself as a “forward-looking, innovative” business when that’s the case. Then Sean asked: “Why be positive when you can be cynical?” In his view, this seems like “a major heat check before the IPO.” Yes,becoming a neocloudmight be “a more believable business in the near term,” but it’s less likely to get outside investors excited in the long term. (And then there’sthe environmental lawsuitthat xAI is facing over Colossus 1.) Keep reading for a preview of our conversation, edited for length and clarity. Sean O’Kane:I always love a surprise, especially when everybody’s eyes [are] on another ball,a major trialthat’s happening. Seemingly out of nowhere this week, SpaceX and therefore its AI subsidiary xAI — which apparently no longer exists now, or is imminently not about to exist, which we can get to — struck a deal with Anthropic. Basically, the real version of the deal is that Anthropic’s essentially taking over all of the compute at the data center known as Colossus 1 in Memphis, Tennessee, to focus on Anthropic’s more enterprise-focused AI products. There’s been a lot of reporting about how [Anthropic’s] been looking for more compute […] and it seems like an escape valve for them to be able to strike this deal and get access to all this compute. In the near term, for xAI and for SpaceX, yes, they are a neocloud now, in the sense that they had to do something with all this compute that they were building, because it certainly seems like they were not going to need it for Grok — which, outside of X, is not burning up the world as far as becoming the new hot consumer chat bot. Kirsten Korosec:And we should say that in terms of what a neocloud is, for those who don’t know, this is the idea of buying GPUs from Nvidia and the like, and renting those out as opposed to using those for their own AI, training their own AI models. So this is a different kind of business, andthe point that our AI editor, Russell Brandom, makesis that a lot of companies are building out data centers, but if given a choice between, do they rent them out [or using them to train their own models], they are still prioritizing using this compute for their own internal AI model training. I think that’s an important point and one that suggests that maybe xAI isn’t doing so much on the AI model training [side] Anthony Ha:Right, and as Sean was alluding to, most people would not necessarily think of Grok as — not only that it’s known for some pretty unpleasant, if notdownright illegal, content, but also it’s not necessarily super cutting edge. Especially if we start talking about enterprise AI, which I know we’re gonna be getting into later in this episode, you don’t hear a lot about people using Grok for work-critical tasks. And so the question becomes: How can xAI actually make money? And apparently just selling the infrastructure could be one of the main ways to do it. Kirsten:And you could take a positive view on that, right? They figured out a way to make money. But I think that when you are positioning your company — in this case, SpaceX-slash-xAI — as a forward-looking, innovative company, that’s tougher to sell if you are simply just renting out your GPUs and not using them for that innovation. Sean:But why be positive when you can be cynical? Which is to say that this seems like a major heat check before the IPO that we’re about to see get rammed into the markets with SpaceX. Anthony, you mentioned not only is Grok not being used for big enterprise tasks, there’s been reporting that xAI employees wereusing other models, they weren’t even using [Grok] internally, and that caused this big shakeup inside of xAI, postacquisition from SpaceX, that involved essentiallyall the co-founders leaving other than Elon Musk, [and] him basically saying he’s starting from scratch on xAI, despite the fact that SpaceX paid $250 billion for it in the run up to this mega-IPO. And now he’s saying thatthey’re going to dissolve xAIas a separate entity inside SpaceX altogether. He’s starting to call the whole thing SpaceXAI, because this man loves nothing but to ruin a brand that has some value to it — see Twitter. This may be a more believable business in the near term, and so on some level, I could see this being maybe more attractive to investors come IPO time, because it’s like a bit more reliable and certainly more real than them being a frontier lab developer. But it’s also not the kind of business that’s going to draw the same — at least, in a normal environment — outside investment that we’re seeing go into all the frontier labs. That’s maybe one of the biggest tension points we’ve seen develop during this IPO process. Loading the player…

4 hours ago

View

‘We Have Swarms of Agents’: Yasmeen Ahmad on Google’s Future of Enterprise AI

‘We Have Swarms of Agents’: Yasmeen Ahmad on Google’s Future of Enterprise AI

Google has introduced Knowledge Catalog, a context engine to enhance data interpretation in multi-cloud environments.

8 hours ago

View

How to Use Netflix's New AI Voice Search Feature: A Step-by-Step Guide

How to Use Netflix's New AI Voice Search Feature: A Step-by-Step Guide

Netflix recently began rolling out a new way for viewers to search for shows and movies on its platform. While we can search for content online via voice dictation, it merely presents results based on keywords. However, the new native AI-based voice search tool will provide contextual search results, taking the intent of the user's query into account. Currently available to a small set of users in beta, the content streaming company is asking users to test the new functionality and provide feedback on how it can be refined, while also pointing out the bugs and issues. The company has yet to announce when the stable version of the AI search tool will be rolled out to a wider global user base.

16 hours ago

View