AI NewsAs more Americans adopt AI tools, fewer say they can trust the results

As more Americans adopt AI tools, fewer say they can trust the results

5:32 AM IST · March 31, 2026

As more Americans adopt AI tools, fewer say they can trust the results

Americans are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence to help with things like research, writing, school or work projects, and analyzing data — but they’re not exactly happy about it. Even as AI use and adoption rises, Americans continue to lack trust in the new tool, according to aQuinnipiac University pollpublished Monday. Of the nearly 1,400 Americans surveyed, more than three-quarters said they don’t trust AI — 76% say they trust it rarely or only sometimes, compared to just 21% who trust it most or almost all of the time. That comes even as an increasing number of Americans adopt AI in their daily lives; only 27% said they’ve never used AI tools, down from 33% in April 2025. “The contradiction between use and trust of AI is striking,” said Chetan Jaiswal, a computer science professor at Quinnipiac. “Fifty-one percent say they use AI for research, and many also use it for writing, work, and data analysis. But only 21 percent trust AI-generated information most or almost all of the time. Americans are clearly adopting AI, but they are doing so with deep hesitation, not deep trust.” Part of that lack of trust might come from a feeling of dread about the future AI will bring. The poll found only a paltry 6% were “very excited” about AI while 62% were either not so excited or not at all excited. Those numbers are basically flipped when we talk about concern: 80% are either very concerned or somewhat concerned about AI, with millennials and baby boomers taking the mantle of most worried, and Gen Z following not far behind. A solid half (55%) say AI will do more harm than good in their day-to-day lives, while only a third say AI will do more good than harm, according to the poll. More people have negative views about AI compared to last year’s survey, according to the researchers — which may not be surprising after a year of Big Tech layoffs, life-endingAI psychosis cases, and energy-grid-straining data centers. Americans across the board oppose building AI data centers in their communities, with 65% saying they wouldn’t want one built, primarily citing high electricity costs and water use. A majority (70%) think AI advancements will cut the number of job opportunities, whereas only 7% think AI will lead to more job opportunities. That’s a shift from the 56% of Americans who last year thought advancements in AI would lead to a decrease in jobs and the 13% who thought AI would increase job opportunities. Members of Gen Z, born between 1997 and 2008, are the most pessimistic, with 81% foreseeing a decrease in jobs. They’re not exactly imagining it, either. Entry-level job postings in the U.S. havesunk 35% since 2023,and AI leaders like Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei havewarnedthat the tech will wipe out jobs. “Younger Americans report the highest familiarity with AI tools, but they are also the least optimistic about the labor market,” Tamilla Triantoro, a professor of business analytics and information systems at Quinnipiac, said in a statement. “AI fluency and optimism here are moving in opposite directions.” Interestingly, even though most Americans are worried about AI’s effect on the labor market as a whole, most don’t think it’s coming for their jobs specifically. Among employed Americans, 30% are concerned AI will make their jobs obsolete. Still, that’s up from 21% last year. “Americans are more worried about what AI may do to the labor market than about what it may do to their own jobs,” Triantoro said. “People seem more willing to predict a tougher market than to picture themselves on the losing end of that disruption — a pattern worth watching as the technology moves deeper into the workplace,” Perhaps a big reason Americans have trust issues with AI is because they don’t believe the companies behind the technology are telling the truth. Two-thirds of respondents said businesses aren’t doing enough to be transparent about their AI use. That same percentage also says the government isn’t doing enough to regulate AI. The sentiment comes as states push to maintain their authority over AI rules, even as federal officials — including under Trump’s latest, largelylight-touch AI framework— and industry leaders advocate for limiting state-level regulation. “Americans are not rejecting AI outright, but they are sending a warning,” Triantoro said. “Too much uncertainty, too little trust, too little regulation, and too much fear about jobs.”

read more

Latest AI News

View All News →
Anthropic says ‘evil’ portrayals of AI were responsible for Claude’s blackmail attempts

Anthropic says ‘evil’ portrayals of AI were responsible for Claude’s blackmail attempts

Fictional portrayals of artificial intelligence can have a real effect on AI models, according to Anthropic. Last year, the company said that during pre-release tests involving a fictional company, Claude Opus 4 would oftentry to blackmail engineersto avoid being replaced by another system. Anthropic laterpublished researchsuggesting that models from other companies had similar issues with “agentic misalignment.” Apparently Anthropic has done more work around that behavior, claiming ina post on X, “We believe the original source of the behavior was internet text that portrays AI as evil and interested in self-preservation.” The company went into more detail ina blog poststating that since Claude Haiku 4.5, Anthropic’s models “never engage in blackmail [during testing], where previous models would sometimes do so up to 96% of the time.” What accounts for the difference? The company said it found that “documents about Claude’s constitution and fictional stories about AIs behaving admirably improve alignment.” Related, Anthropic said that it found training to be more effective when it includes “the principles underlying aligned behavior” and not just “demonstrations of aligned behavior alone.” “Doing both together appears to be the most effective strategy,” the company said.

36 minutes ago

View

We’re feeling cynical about xAI’s big deal with Anthropic

We’re feeling cynical about xAI’s big deal with Anthropic

Anthropic and xAIannounced a big partnershipthis week, with Anthropic buying all the compute capacity at xAI’s Colossus 1 data center in Tennessee. On the latest episode ofTechCrunch’s Equity podcast, Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and I discussed what the deal might mean for xAI’s parent company SpaceX, as SpaceX prepares to go public andapparently plans to dissolve xAIas a separate organization. Kirsten did her best to offer “a positive view” on the partnership — after all, it’s a new way for xAI to make money. But she also noted that this also suggests xAI isn’t doing much when it comes to training its own frontier AI models, and it’s harder for the company to position itself as a “forward-looking, innovative” business when that’s the case. Then Sean asked: “Why be positive when you can be cynical?” In his view, this seems like “a major heat check before the IPO.” Yes,becoming a neocloudmight be “a more believable business in the near term,” but it’s less likely to get outside investors excited in the long term. (And then there’sthe environmental lawsuitthat xAI is facing over Colossus 1.) Keep reading for a preview of our conversation, edited for length and clarity. Sean O’Kane:I always love a surprise, especially when everybody’s eyes [are] on another ball,a major trialthat’s happening. Seemingly out of nowhere this week, SpaceX and therefore its AI subsidiary xAI — which apparently no longer exists now, or is imminently not about to exist, which we can get to — struck a deal with Anthropic. Basically, the real version of the deal is that Anthropic’s essentially taking over all of the compute at the data center known as Colossus 1 in Memphis, Tennessee, to focus on Anthropic’s more enterprise-focused AI products. There’s been a lot of reporting about how [Anthropic’s] been looking for more compute […] and it seems like an escape valve for them to be able to strike this deal and get access to all this compute. In the near term, for xAI and for SpaceX, yes, they are a neocloud now, in the sense that they had to do something with all this compute that they were building, because it certainly seems like they were not going to need it for Grok — which, outside of X, is not burning up the world as far as becoming the new hot consumer chat bot. Kirsten Korosec:And we should say that in terms of what a neocloud is, for those who don’t know, this is the idea of buying GPUs from Nvidia and the like, and renting those out as opposed to using those for their own AI, training their own AI models. So this is a different kind of business, andthe point that our AI editor, Russell Brandom, makesis that a lot of companies are building out data centers, but if given a choice between, do they rent them out [or using them to train their own models], they are still prioritizing using this compute for their own internal AI model training. I think that’s an important point and one that suggests that maybe xAI isn’t doing so much on the AI model training [side] Anthony Ha:Right, and as Sean was alluding to, most people would not necessarily think of Grok as — not only that it’s known for some pretty unpleasant, if notdownright illegal, content, but also it’s not necessarily super cutting edge. Especially if we start talking about enterprise AI, which I know we’re gonna be getting into later in this episode, you don’t hear a lot about people using Grok for work-critical tasks. And so the question becomes: How can xAI actually make money? And apparently just selling the infrastructure could be one of the main ways to do it. Kirsten:And you could take a positive view on that, right? They figured out a way to make money. But I think that when you are positioning your company — in this case, SpaceX-slash-xAI — as a forward-looking, innovative company, that’s tougher to sell if you are simply just renting out your GPUs and not using them for that innovation. Sean:But why be positive when you can be cynical? Which is to say that this seems like a major heat check before the IPO that we’re about to see get rammed into the markets with SpaceX. Anthony, you mentioned not only is Grok not being used for big enterprise tasks, there’s been reporting that xAI employees wereusing other models, they weren’t even using [Grok] internally, and that caused this big shakeup inside of xAI, postacquisition from SpaceX, that involved essentiallyall the co-founders leaving other than Elon Musk, [and] him basically saying he’s starting from scratch on xAI, despite the fact that SpaceX paid $250 billion for it in the run up to this mega-IPO. And now he’s saying thatthey’re going to dissolve xAIas a separate entity inside SpaceX altogether. He’s starting to call the whole thing SpaceXAI, because this man loves nothing but to ruin a brand that has some value to it — see Twitter. This may be a more believable business in the near term, and so on some level, I could see this being maybe more attractive to investors come IPO time, because it’s like a bit more reliable and certainly more real than them being a frontier lab developer. But it’s also not the kind of business that’s going to draw the same — at least, in a normal environment — outside investment that we’re seeing go into all the frontier labs. That’s maybe one of the biggest tension points we’ve seen develop during this IPO process. Loading the player…

4 hours ago

View

‘We Have Swarms of Agents’: Yasmeen Ahmad on Google’s Future of Enterprise AI

‘We Have Swarms of Agents’: Yasmeen Ahmad on Google’s Future of Enterprise AI

Google has introduced Knowledge Catalog, a context engine to enhance data interpretation in multi-cloud environments.

8 hours ago

View

How to Use Netflix's New AI Voice Search Feature: A Step-by-Step Guide

How to Use Netflix's New AI Voice Search Feature: A Step-by-Step Guide

Netflix recently began rolling out a new way for viewers to search for shows and movies on its platform. While we can search for content online via voice dictation, it merely presents results based on keywords. However, the new native AI-based voice search tool will provide contextual search results, taking the intent of the user's query into account. Currently available to a small set of users in beta, the content streaming company is asking users to test the new functionality and provide feedback on how it can be refined, while also pointing out the bugs and issues. The company has yet to announce when the stable version of the AI search tool will be rolled out to a wider global user base.

16 hours ago

View