AI NewsAnthropic’s Claude popularity with paying consumers is skyrocketing

Anthropic’s Claude popularity with paying consumers is skyrocketing

9:28 PM IST · March 28, 2026

Anthropic’s Claude popularity with paying consumers is skyrocketing

Whatever the final outcome for Anthropic from itsfeudwith the Department of Defense, the attention it has generated — coupled with the company’s funnySuper Bowl adstaking aim at OpenAI and thesurging popularityof Claude Code — has made Anthropic more popular with consumers than ever. An examination of billions of anonymized credit card transactions from about 28 million U.S. consumers, conducted for TechCrunch byIndagari, a consumer transaction analysis company, shows Claude gaining paid subscribers in record numbers. Now, as with all big-data analysis, caveats exist. While this data is substantive, it doesn’t include every consumer. That means that Indagari can’t calculate Anthropic’s total current or new user numbers. It also doesn’t include Claude’s enterprise business (which is its bread and butter) or its free-tier users (those not paying Anthropic at all). Estimates for total Claude consumer users are all over the map (we’ve seen figures ranging from 18 million to 30 million) but Anthropic has not disclosed this data. A spokesperson did tell TechCrunch, however, that Claude paid subscriptions have more than doubled this year. What’s notable is that consumers pulled out their wallets in record numbers for Claude between January and February. Also interesting, previous users returned to Claude in record numbers in February as well, Indagari told TechCrunch. Indagari tells us that the majority of new subscribers are at its lowest tier, “Pro” users ($20 per month, compared with $100 or $200 per month). Data through early March confirm that subscriber growth is continuing. (Data is available with a two-week delay.) To recap why consumers may have become so much more aware of Claude since January: Anthropic released several Super Bowl commercials that mocked ChatGPT’s decision to show ads to its users — and promised Claude would never do the same. The spotswere funny and effective(and alsogot under the skin of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman). But the bigger hullabaloo began in late January when multiple media sites, including the Wall Street Journal and Axios, began reporting on a deepening feud between Anthropic and the DoD. At its core, the dispute was about what the military could and couldn’t do with Anthropic’s AI. Anthropic refused to allow the DoD to use its AI models for lethal autonomous operations (AI potentially killing people) or mass surveillance of American citizens. That beef grew increasingly public, with Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei issuing a makingfirm public statementon February 26 amid the DoD’s threats to hurt Anthropic’s business by labeling the company a supply risk. Which the DoD did. Lawsuits are now flying, although a federal judge this week temporarily blocked the department’s designation. New user growth climbed sharply during this period. The increase is especially pronounced between those late January media reports and Amodei’s statement on February 26. Beyond the drama, Claude Code andClaude Cowork— developer and productivity tools released in January — have been drivers of subscriptions. TheComputer Usefeature, released this week, has also sparked a surge, Anthropic tells TechCrunch. That feature allows Claude to navigate a computer independently — clicking, scrolling, and taking actions on its own. It works with Dispatch, which lets users assign tasks from their phones. These features are not available to free-tier users. Still, for all of Anthropic’s growth among U.S. consumers willing to pay for AI, Claude remains a long way behind ChatGPT. While OpenAI’suninstalls spiked immediatelyafter it announced a deal with the DoD — a move that stood in contrast to Anthropic’s safety stand — Indagari’s data shows that OpenAI is still gaining new paid subscribers at a rapid rate and remains the biggest consumer AI platform of them all.

read more

Latest AI News

View All News →
Anthropic says ‘evil’ portrayals of AI were responsible for Claude’s blackmail attempts

Anthropic says ‘evil’ portrayals of AI were responsible for Claude’s blackmail attempts

Fictional portrayals of artificial intelligence can have a real effect on AI models, according to Anthropic. Last year, the company said that during pre-release tests involving a fictional company, Claude Opus 4 would oftentry to blackmail engineersto avoid being replaced by another system. Anthropic laterpublished researchsuggesting that models from other companies had similar issues with “agentic misalignment.” Apparently Anthropic has done more work around that behavior, claiming ina post on X, “We believe the original source of the behavior was internet text that portrays AI as evil and interested in self-preservation.” The company went into more detail ina blog poststating that since Claude Haiku 4.5, Anthropic’s models “never engage in blackmail [during testing], where previous models would sometimes do so up to 96% of the time.” What accounts for the difference? The company said it found that “documents about Claude’s constitution and fictional stories about AIs behaving admirably improve alignment.” Related, Anthropic said that it found training to be more effective when it includes “the principles underlying aligned behavior” and not just “demonstrations of aligned behavior alone.” “Doing both together appears to be the most effective strategy,” the company said.

2 hours ago

View

We’re feeling cynical about xAI’s big deal with Anthropic

We’re feeling cynical about xAI’s big deal with Anthropic

Anthropic and xAIannounced a big partnershipthis week, with Anthropic buying all the compute capacity at xAI’s Colossus 1 data center in Tennessee. On the latest episode ofTechCrunch’s Equity podcast, Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and I discussed what the deal might mean for xAI’s parent company SpaceX, as SpaceX prepares to go public andapparently plans to dissolve xAIas a separate organization. Kirsten did her best to offer “a positive view” on the partnership — after all, it’s a new way for xAI to make money. But she also noted that this also suggests xAI isn’t doing much when it comes to training its own frontier AI models, and it’s harder for the company to position itself as a “forward-looking, innovative” business when that’s the case. Then Sean asked: “Why be positive when you can be cynical?” In his view, this seems like “a major heat check before the IPO.” Yes,becoming a neocloudmight be “a more believable business in the near term,” but it’s less likely to get outside investors excited in the long term. (And then there’sthe environmental lawsuitthat xAI is facing over Colossus 1.) Keep reading for a preview of our conversation, edited for length and clarity. Sean O’Kane:I always love a surprise, especially when everybody’s eyes [are] on another ball,a major trialthat’s happening. Seemingly out of nowhere this week, SpaceX and therefore its AI subsidiary xAI — which apparently no longer exists now, or is imminently not about to exist, which we can get to — struck a deal with Anthropic. Basically, the real version of the deal is that Anthropic’s essentially taking over all of the compute at the data center known as Colossus 1 in Memphis, Tennessee, to focus on Anthropic’s more enterprise-focused AI products. There’s been a lot of reporting about how [Anthropic’s] been looking for more compute […] and it seems like an escape valve for them to be able to strike this deal and get access to all this compute. In the near term, for xAI and for SpaceX, yes, they are a neocloud now, in the sense that they had to do something with all this compute that they were building, because it certainly seems like they were not going to need it for Grok — which, outside of X, is not burning up the world as far as becoming the new hot consumer chat bot. Kirsten Korosec:And we should say that in terms of what a neocloud is, for those who don’t know, this is the idea of buying GPUs from Nvidia and the like, and renting those out as opposed to using those for their own AI, training their own AI models. So this is a different kind of business, andthe point that our AI editor, Russell Brandom, makesis that a lot of companies are building out data centers, but if given a choice between, do they rent them out [or using them to train their own models], they are still prioritizing using this compute for their own internal AI model training. I think that’s an important point and one that suggests that maybe xAI isn’t doing so much on the AI model training [side] Anthony Ha:Right, and as Sean was alluding to, most people would not necessarily think of Grok as — not only that it’s known for some pretty unpleasant, if notdownright illegal, content, but also it’s not necessarily super cutting edge. Especially if we start talking about enterprise AI, which I know we’re gonna be getting into later in this episode, you don’t hear a lot about people using Grok for work-critical tasks. And so the question becomes: How can xAI actually make money? And apparently just selling the infrastructure could be one of the main ways to do it. Kirsten:And you could take a positive view on that, right? They figured out a way to make money. But I think that when you are positioning your company — in this case, SpaceX-slash-xAI — as a forward-looking, innovative company, that’s tougher to sell if you are simply just renting out your GPUs and not using them for that innovation. Sean:But why be positive when you can be cynical? Which is to say that this seems like a major heat check before the IPO that we’re about to see get rammed into the markets with SpaceX. Anthony, you mentioned not only is Grok not being used for big enterprise tasks, there’s been reporting that xAI employees wereusing other models, they weren’t even using [Grok] internally, and that caused this big shakeup inside of xAI, postacquisition from SpaceX, that involved essentiallyall the co-founders leaving other than Elon Musk, [and] him basically saying he’s starting from scratch on xAI, despite the fact that SpaceX paid $250 billion for it in the run up to this mega-IPO. And now he’s saying thatthey’re going to dissolve xAIas a separate entity inside SpaceX altogether. He’s starting to call the whole thing SpaceXAI, because this man loves nothing but to ruin a brand that has some value to it — see Twitter. This may be a more believable business in the near term, and so on some level, I could see this being maybe more attractive to investors come IPO time, because it’s like a bit more reliable and certainly more real than them being a frontier lab developer. But it’s also not the kind of business that’s going to draw the same — at least, in a normal environment — outside investment that we’re seeing go into all the frontier labs. That’s maybe one of the biggest tension points we’ve seen develop during this IPO process. Loading the player…

6 hours ago

View

‘We Have Swarms of Agents’: Yasmeen Ahmad on Google’s Future of Enterprise AI

‘We Have Swarms of Agents’: Yasmeen Ahmad on Google’s Future of Enterprise AI

Google has introduced Knowledge Catalog, a context engine to enhance data interpretation in multi-cloud environments.

10 hours ago

View

How to Use Netflix's New AI Voice Search Feature: A Step-by-Step Guide

How to Use Netflix's New AI Voice Search Feature: A Step-by-Step Guide

Netflix recently began rolling out a new way for viewers to search for shows and movies on its platform. While we can search for content online via voice dictation, it merely presents results based on keywords. However, the new native AI-based voice search tool will provide contextual search results, taking the intent of the user's query into account. Currently available to a small set of users in beta, the content streaming company is asking users to test the new functionality and provide feedback on how it can be refined, while also pointing out the bugs and issues. The company has yet to announce when the stable version of the AI search tool will be rolled out to a wider global user base.

18 hours ago

View