AI NewsAI âactorâ Tilly Norwood put out the worst song Iâve ever heard
AI âactorâ Tilly Norwood put out the worst song Iâve ever heard
2:30 PM IST · March 12, 2026

When the production company Particle6 debuted itsAI-generated âactorâ Tilly Norwoodlast fall, the move was not warmly welcomed by Hollywood. âGood Lord, weâre screwed,â Golden Globe winner Emily Bluntsaidin an interview with the industry publication Variety. âCome on, agencies, donât do that. Please stop.â If only Particle6 followed Bluntâs advice. Instead, the company has put out a music video for its AI character, featuring a song called âTake the Lead.â This is not clickbait. Upon listening to it, I actually think it is the worst song I have ever heard. I was prepared for Norwoodâs musical debut to sound something like âHow Was I Supposed to Know?â, the AI-generated song attributed to the digital persona Xania Monet, which turned heads when it made it onto the Billboard R&B charts. Xania Monetâs AI-generated music isnât my cup of tea, even if its lyrics are supposedly written by a real person â I personally prefer music that could exist without an AI music generator likeSuno. But Norwoodâs song has unlocked a new level of AI cringe. Eighteen people contributed to the video for âTake the Lead,â including designers, prompters, and editors. Yet the song itself is about Tillyâs challenges as an AI-generated character who critics underestimate, because they believe she is not human. âThey say itâs not real, that itâs fake,â Norwood snarls at the camera. âBut I am still human, make no mistake.â That is, to put it gently, not true. Music does not have to be relatable to everyone, but perhaps it should be relatable to at least one person. Whatâs most impressive about Norwoodâs song is that the AI characterâs team managed to create a song about something that literally no human will ever experience, because no person can connect with the feeling of being disregarded for being an AI. The song, which sounds like a Sara Bareillis rip-off, opens with the lines, âWhen they talk about me, they donât see/The human spark, the creativity.â The song builds as Norwood affirms to herself, âIâm not a puppet, Iâm the star.â Then comes the chorus, in which Norwood appeals to her fellow AI actors: Actors, itâs time to take the leadCreate the future, plant the seedDonât be left out, donât fall behindBuild your own, and youâll be freeWe can scale, we can growBe the creators weâve always knownItâs the next evolution, canât you see?AIâs not the enemy, itâs the key In the video, Norwood struts down a hallway in a data center, which is perhaps the only part of the video grounded in any element of honesty. When the second chorus hits with a predictable key change, she instead walks across a stage, looking out into a stadium of cheering fake people who give her an undeserved moment of âtriumph.â You could make the argument that Norwood is trying to appeal to actors at large and not just other AI characters. But the outro leaves no question that this is, in fact, a rallying cry from Tilly to her AI brethren: Take your power, take the stageThe next evolution is all the rageUnlock it all, donât hesitateAI Actors, we create our fate We do not need this. We do not need music from an AI persona addressing other AI personas with a hopeful anthem about working together to prove judgmental humans wrong. Twenty years ago, the influential music publication Pitchfork gave Jetâs album âShine Onâ a 0.0 out of 10. Instead of writing a review, they just embedded a YouTube video ofa monkey peeing into its own mouth. The Jet album isnât abhorrent, but Pitchfork editor Scott Plagenhoefexplained in a 2024 interviewwhy the siteâs writers had been so angry about it all those years ago. âSeeing mainstream rock music, which of course most of us had grown up with a fondness for, become so knuckle-dragging and Xeroxed was disappointing,â he said. These are the same complaints that artists have today about AI-generated works â these productions ring hollow and simply reproduce the work of artists past. ââTilly Norwoodâ is not an actor; itâs a character generated by a computer program that was trained on the work of countless professional performers â without permission or compensation,â SAG-AFTRA, the union representing actors, wrote in astatementlast fall. âIt has no life experience to draw from, no emotion and, from what weâve seen, audiences arenât interested in watching computer-generated content untethered from the human experience. It doesnât solve any âproblemâ â it creates the problem of using stolen performances to put actors out of work, jeopardizing performer livelihoods and devaluing human artistry. While Jet was taking inspiration from older rock groups to make its âknuckle-dragging and Xeroxedâ music, Tilly Norwood is literally derived from AI models that could not exist without the training data that tech companies took from artists without their consent. I think Pitchfork jumped the gun. Twenty years later, they finally have a worthy subject.
read more



