🚀 Zaprep: je socials on steroids. Start gratis — automatiseer 1.000 DM's/maand en zet engagement om in leads. met 1.000 geautomatiseerde DM's/maand.
Dien je tool in
PoweredByAI.app is een AI-toolsdirectory die individuen, bedrijven en creators helpt de beste AI-tools te ontdekken voor schrijven, coderen, design, productiviteit en meer.
© 2026 , Een product van011BQ. Alle rechten voorbehouden.
As enterprises race to build AI-native architectures, the debate is no longer whether to automate, but how much.
View
The deal will see TCS modernise Canada Life's infrastructure operations across Europe using AI-led automation, data centre modernisation, and software lifecycle management services.
View
LG Electronics will use NVIDIA Isaac Sim and Isaac Lab to simulate, train, and validate household robots before deployment.
View
The leadership-led initiative aims to democratise AI capability, accelerate innovation culture, and prepare the workforce for the future of intelligent enterprises.
View
Krishnan plans to continue working on AI challenges after leaving the White House.
View
Broadcom’s AI chip business is growing so fast that big tech’s chip strategy may be shifting beyond NVIDIA.
View
Practo has been experimenting with machine learning since 2014–15, beginning with search and doctor recommendation systems.
View
The new AI ecosystem moves beyond traditional language models by incorporating cultural intelligence, multilingual voice generation, and AI-powered digital personas.
View
OpenAI has announced a new security feature for ChatGPT to safeguard users and organisations from prompt injection attacks. Dubbed Lockdown Mode, it is an optional setting within the AI chatbot that is claimed to protect sensitive user data from being exposed. As per the company, it is available across all ChatGPT account types and workspaces, including personal, business, and enterprise accounts. Lockdown Mode restricts several ChatGPT capabilities that rely on internet access or external services when enabled.
View
The industry’s answer to rising AI costs is bringing more compute closer to the edge.
View
Microsoft recently announcedmajor pricing changes for GitHub Copilot— changes that were drastic enough that a Reddit user said their company hasstarted calling it the Tokenpocalypse. On the latest episode ofTechCrunch’s Equity podcast, Kirsten Korosec, Sean O’Kane, and I discussed what those changes might mean for the larger AI ecosystem. After all, as Anthropic and other big AI companies plan to go public, leading toawkward questions about profitability, we’re likely to see similar price increases for other AI products, and more usage restrictions asbusinesses try to keep costs under control. “Can these AI labs collapse that cost [and] progress the tech enough in a way that it eventually meets in the middle with customers’ appetite for spending?” Sean wondered. Kirsten, meanwhile, suggested that this also reflects “how quickly things are moving.” In just a few months, companiesbecame obsessed with “tokenmaxxxing,”then turned against it due to the high costs. So as AI companies write their IPO filings, she asked, “How do you even write these risks in, because they are evolving before our eyes?” Keep reading for a preview of our conversation, edited for length and clarity. Anthony Ha:When we were planning for this, Sean, you called this the Tokenpocalypse. And I want to hear more about what you think about it, but there was an example of Microsoft deciding with GitHub Copilot that they’re going to startcharging more per token[instead of a flat rate]. This whole ecosystem is heavily, heavily subsidized by investor money. And so stuff that seems like it has no cost is, in fact, incredibly expensive. And now we’re going to get to a point where more of that cost is going to get passed on to the end consumer, to the customer. How is that going to change behavior? I don’t think we know, but there’s going to be a lot of pain. Sean O’Kane:I mean, how many token-related risk factors do we think are going to be in the Anthropic’s S-1? This is a big question. It’s something that I’ve mentioned a lot on this show and we seem to just keep running into it, whereUber has done like the full arcin the span of a month and a half of saying, “Boy, we kind of blew through our budget on this stuff way quicker than we thought this year.” And then, “Ooh, maybe this is going to be a little too expensive, we need to put caps on this, and we need to limit people’s usage inside the company.” That’s just a little worrying. Imagine if you see that happen so quickly at a company like Uber, that is using this stuff a lot, and it’s just a question of: Can these AI labs collapse that cost [and] progress the tech enough in a way that it eventually meets in the middle with customers’ appetite for spending? A funny thing to think back on is, I don’t think there was really any strategy involved in charging $20 a month [for ChatGPT Plus] when ChatGPT originally came out. It was just sort of like, “Let’s spit out a number.” And we’ve all been reckoning with that ever since. Clearly, people pay more for the more advanced models, but even that still isn’t enough to close that gap to the true cost. So that’s clearly the biggest question here. Kirsten:All of this, to me, illustrates how quickly things are moving. I mean, when you really think about it, the whole tokenmaxxxing thing has become a thing, peaked, and now is seen disfavorably, within six months. The scale of this, the whole pricing mechanism, to your point, was put in place before business models were really shaped and solidified around AI labs. And then, at the same time, you have the government trying to catch up. Also this week,President Trump signed an executive order— it is a narrow version, but this is designed to give the government a chance to review powerful AI models. So you have all this happening at a pace that I don’t think I’ve ever experienced. That’s why I’m really looking forward to some of these S-1 IPO registration statements, because of the risk [factors]. How do you even write these risks in, because they are evolving before our eyes, and day by day? Anthony:Uber is an interesting example, Sean, because you mentioned their AI spend, but they’ve also come up in the AI discourse because sometimes, people who think there’s this bubble, they’ll bring up just how wildly unprofitable these tools are, these companies are, and then people will bring up Uber as a response. People talked about how unprofitable Uber was, but eventually you get to scale and then you close that gap. And I think that’s true. But also, for Uber to do that, it had to really transform itself as a company in a lot of ways. What Uber was at the beginning and what it is now, all the different areas of business that it’s had to expand into, the different ways that customers and drivers have gotten squeezed, those are things that had to happen to get to the point where it could be a profitable company. And I think you’re going to have to see similar transformations for a lot of these AI companies if they’re going to survive. Sean:Is there any way that these labs can squeeze pennies like Uber has squeezed the drivers over the years? Is there something squishy enough there for them to do that? I don’t know. This seems like harder, more straightforward costs in a lot of ways, so it’ll be interesting.
OpenAI plans to roll out a revamped version of ChatGPT in the coming weeks — one that will serve as a “super app” with coding tools and AI agents,according to the Financial Times. The company’s goal is reportedly to become more competitive with Anthropic, particularly among business customers, and to get closer to profitability before an IPO. That means turning ChatGPT into a gateway leading free users to products they might actually pay for, such as coding product Codex. In fact, the FT quotes one senior OpenAI employee as declaring, “Chat is dead.” Thibault Sottiaux, who leads OpenAI’s core product and platform, said the company is working towards a product “where you have your own personal agent that is capable of helping you … across everything in your life, be it personally or at work.” If this sounds familiar, it’s because there have beenreports about OpenAI’s super app ambitionssince last year. In March, The Wall Street Journal reported that these plansrepresent a major strategy shiftfor the company after launching a variety of standalone products in 2025; OpenAI executives now saythey’re abandoning “side quests” likevideo generator Sora.
View
View
