🚀 Zaprep: Tus redes sociales al máximo. Empezar gratis con 1,000 DMs automatizados/mes.

Últimas Noticias de IA

Investors spill what they aren’t looking for anymore in AI SaaS companies

Investors spill what they aren’t looking for anymore in AI SaaS companies

Investors have been pouring billions into AI companies over the past few years, as the technology continues to hold sway in the Valley and thus the world. But not all AI companies are grabbing investor attention. Indeed, even as it seems every company these days is rebranding to include “AI” in its name, some startup ideas are just no longer in favor with investors. TechCrunch spoke with VCs to learn what investors aren’t looking for in AI software-as-a-service startups anymore. Popular SaaS categories for investors now include startups building AI-native infrastructure, vertical SaaS with proprietary data, systems of action (those helping users complete tasks), and platforms deeply embedded in mission-critical workflows, according to Aaron Holiday, a managing partner at 645 Ventures. But he also gave a list of companies that are considered quite boring to investors these days: Startups building thin workflow layers, generic horizontal tools, light product management, and surface-level analytics — basically, anything an AI agent can now do. Abdul Abdirahman, an investor at the firm F Prime, added that generic vertical software “without proprietary data moats” is no longer popular, and Igor Ryabenky, a founder and managing partner at AltaIR Capital, went deeper on that point. He said investors aren’t interested in anything, really, that doesn’t have much product depth. “If your differentiation lives mostly in UI [user interface] and automation, that’s no longer enough,” he said. “The barrier to entry has dropped, which makes building a real moat much harder.” New companies entering the market now need to build around “real workflow ownership and a clear understanding of the problem from day one,” he said.  “Massive codebases are no longer an advantage. What matters more is speed, focus, and the ability to adapt quickly. Pricing also needs to be flexible: rigid per-seat models will be harder to defend, while consumption-based models make more sense in this environment.” Jake Saper, a general partner at Emergence Capital, also had thoughts on ownership. To him, the differences between Cursor and Claude Code are the “canary in the coal mine.” “One owns the developer’s workflow, the other just executes the task,” Saper continued. “Developers are increasingly choosing the execution over process.” He said any product dealing with “workflow stickiness” — meaning trying to attract as many human customers as possible to continuously use the product — might find themselves in an uphill battle as agents takeover the workflow. “Pre-Claude, getting humans to do their jobs inside your software was a powerful moat, but if agents are doing the work, who cares about human workflow?” he told TechCrunch. He also thinks integrations are becoming less popular, especially as Anthropic’s model context protocol (MCP) makes it easier than ever to connect AI models to external data and systems. This means someone doesn’t need to download multiple integrations or build their own customer integrations; they can just use the MCP. “Being the connector used to be a moat,” Saper said. “Soon, it’ll be a utility.” Also, no longer en vogue include the “workflow automation and task management tools that enable the coordination of human work become less necessary if, over time, agents just execute the tasks,” Abdirahman said, citing examples, mainly public SaaS companies whose stocks are down as new AI-native startups arise with better, more efficient technology. Ryabenky said the SaaS companies struggling to raise right now are the ones that can easily be replicated, he said. “Generic productivity tools, project management software, basic CRM clones, and thin AI wrappers built on top of existing APIs fall into this category,” he said. “If the product is mostly an interface layer without deep integration, proprietary data, or embedded process knowledge, strong AI-native teams can rebuild it quickly. That is what makes investors cautious.” Overa, what remains attractive about SaaS is depth and expertise, with tools embedded in critical workflows. He said companies should right now look into integrating AI deeply into their products and update their marketing to reflect that, Ryabenky continued. “Investors are reallocating capital toward businesses that own workflows, data, and domain expertise,”  Ryabenky said. “And away from products that can be copied without much effort.”

6 months ago

View

A married founder duo’s company, 14.ai, is replacing customer support teams at startups

A married founder duo’s company, 14.ai, is replacing customer support teams at startups

The customer service industry is in a bit of flux, thanks to AI.Investorsandcorporate leadershave rung alarm bells for the BPO (Business Process Outsourcing) industry. On the other hand, AI-powered customer support startups such as Decagon, Parloa, and Sierra have picked up millions of dollars in funding from venture capitalists. 14.ai, a Y Combinator-backed startup, is taking an approach of building an AI-native agency that has replaced legacy customer support teams at many startups it has worked with. The company has raised $3 million in seed funding led by Y Combinator, with participation from General Catalyst, Base Case Capital, SV Angel, and the founders of Dropbox, Slack, Replit, and Vercel. The startup was founded by a married duo, Marie Schneegans and Michael Fester. The two met in Paris more than a decade ago and went on to build separate companies. Schneegans was a co-founder atcorporate intranet company Workwell. Fester previously founded Snips, a company that worked on local first assistants for smart devices, whichwas acquired by Sonos in 2019. After this, they wanted to build a company together, so they moved to the U.S. The duo picked up customer service as the problem to tackle, but didn’t want to build a pure-play SaaS company. They founded 14.ai to operate as an AI-native customer support agency of sorts. “We’re not building software for customers. 14.ai is an AI-native customer service agency. We combine software and services in one package. For customers, operating software is hard, especially for customer service. We take over their entire operation, and we use our own purpose-built stack for customer service,” Fester said. The company said it can integrate with a support system within a day and start clearing the support ticket backlog very quickly. It can monitor tickets across various channels, including email, calls, chat, TikTok, Facebook, Telegram, and WhatsApp. “We started working with a men’s health supplement company called Sperm Worms by a former YC founder, who had a lot of backlog of tickets. His team of customer service agents was in the Philippines, and they were not being able clear tickets efficiently. We took over on Thursday morning, and by Thursday afternoon, we had cleared tickets from all channels like social media, SMS, email, chat, and voice,” Schneegans said. The company currently has six people working, and they all take turns to be available around the clock for the clients they work with. The startup said that with the new funding, it aims to increase the headcount in the next six months. 14.ai is only working with AI engineers and plans to hire more AI engineers. The startup learns workflows of customer support and other functions, such as sales and revenue growth, and tries to automate tasks through its software so humans have to spend less time on particular issues. “We are not just a support agency, but also a revenue growth engine because we capture all kinds of conversations early on for a client and get insights from them,” Fester said. The company wants to take off three key items from a startup’s balance sheet, including ticketing systems, AI software add-ons, and human labor costs. The startup caters to many clients in different sectors such as luxury skin care brandYon-KA, smart glasses makerBrilliant Labs, andlighting company Creative Lighting. The startup also wants to improve its own product by experimenting and letting AI handle most tasks. For that, it runsGloGlo, a glucose gummies brand for Type 1 diabetics, and tries to operate autonomously with AI. Tom Blomfield, a partner at Y Combinator, thinks that 14.ai strikes the right balance between using AI and humans for customer service. He said that with the right integration, AI can solve 60% of the task automatically, and the remaining 40% could be handled by humans. “As the AI takes over more and more of the work, the balance between AI and humans will change over time. With the existing platforms, the customer is left to handle round after round of painful headcount reductions,” he told TechCrunch over email. “In contrast, 14.ai becomes the customer service department, both AI and human. They can reassign customer support agents between customers who are at different stages of the AI adoption journey, and carry out that load balancing much more effectively,” he added. Notably, AI-powered agencies are one of the things Y Combinator mentioned in itsrequests for startups in 2026.

6 months ago

View

Tech workers urge DOD, Congress to withdraw Anthropic label as a supply chain risk

Tech workers urge DOD, Congress to withdraw Anthropic label as a supply chain risk

Hundreds of tech workers have signed anopen letterurging the Department of Defense to withdraw its designation of Anthropic as a “supply chain risk.” The letter also calls on Congress to step in and “examine whether the use of these extraordinary authorities against an American technology company is appropriate.” The letter includes signatories from major technology and venture capital firms including OpenAI, Slack, IBM, Cursor, Salesforce Ventures, and more. It follows adispute between the DOD and Anthropicafter the AI lab last weekrefused to give the militaryunrestricted access to its AI systems. Anthropic’s two red lines in its negotiations with the Pentagon were that it didn’t want its technology to be used for mass surveillance on Americans or to power autonomous weapons that made targeting and firing decisions without a human in the loop. The DOD said it had no plans to do either of those things, but that it didn’t believe it should be limited by the rules of a vendor. After Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei declined to reach an agreement with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, President Donald Trump on Friday directed federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s technology after a six-month transition period. Hegseth than moved to designate Anthropic a supply chain risk — a designation normally reserved for foreign adversaries that would blacklist the AI firm from working with any agency or company that does business with the Pentagon. In apost on Friday, Hegseth wrote: “Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic.” But a post on X does not automatically make Anthropic a supply chain risk. The government needs to complete a risk assessment and notify Congress before military partners have to cut ties with Anthropic or its products. Anthropic said in ablog postthe destination is both “legally unsound” and that it would “challenge any supply chain risk designation in court.” Many in the industry see the administration’s treatment of Anthropic as harsh and clear retaliation. “When two parties cannot agree on terms, the normal course is to part ways and work with a competitor,” the open letter reads. “This situation sets a dangerous precedent. Punishing an American company for declining to accept changes to a contract sends a clear message to every technology company in America: accept whatever terms the government demands, or face retaliation.” Beyond concern over the government’s harsh treatment of Anthropic, many in the industry are still concerned about potential government overreach and use of AI for nefarious purposes. Boaz Barak, an OpenAI researcher,wrote in a social media poston Monday that blocking governments from using AI to do mass surveillance is also his “personal red line” and “it should be all of ours.” Moments after Trump publicly attacked Anthropic, OpenAI announced it hadreached a dealof its own for its models to be deployed in the DOD’s classified environments. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said last week that the firm has the same red lines as Anthropic. “If anything good can come out of the events of the last week, it would be if we in the AI industry start treating the issue of using AI for government abuse and surveilling its own people as a catastrophic risk of its own right,” Barak wrote. “We have done a good job of evaluations, mitigations, and processes, for risks such as bioweapons and cyber security. Let’s use similar processes here.”

6 months ago

View

Users are ditching ChatGPT for Claude. Here’s how to make the switch

Users are ditching ChatGPT for Claude. Here’s how to make the switch

Many users are switching to Claude following a string of controversies surrounding ChatGPT and its parent company, OpenAI. The tipping point came afterAnthropic, the company behind Claude, refused to allow the Department of Defense to use its AI models for mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weapons. In response, President Trump ordered all federal agencies to stop using Anthropic’s products, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegsethannouncedplans to designate the company a supply-chain threat. Hours later, OpenAIannouncedits own agreement with the Pentagon, claiming to include safeguards, but the deal has still sparked widespread debate over privacy and the ethical use of AI. As a result,Claude has surged to the top of the free app rankingsin Apple’s US App Store, overtaking ChatGPT. According to Anthropic, daily signups have hit record highs, free users have jumped by more than 60% since January, and paid subscribers have more than doubled this year. For many users, the recent controversy has made Claude a compelling alternative to ChatGPT. If you’re considering making the switch, this guide will walk you through transferring your data and closing your ChatGPT account. Breaking up with ChatGPT shouldn’t mean losing years of digital memory. Instead of starting from scratch with a new AI assistant, you can transfer your data to Claude so it can get up to speed on your preferences right away. There are a few ways to do this. One place to start is Settings. From there, you go to Personalization and find the Memory section. Select “Manage” and review your stored information, updating anything that no longer accurately reflects your preferences. Once everything is up to date, copy the content you want to keep. Alternatively, you can export your entire chat history. Head to Settings, select Data Controls, and choose “Export Data.” ChatGPT will compile your chat records into text or JSON files and email them to you. (Be aware that this may take a while if you have a lot of history.) You can also take a manual approach by copying key conversations from your history or asking ChatGPT to summarize your main preferences, frequently discussed topics, and any custom instructions you use. Once you’ve gathered your data, transferring it to Claude is straightforward. Open Claude, go to Settings, then Capabilities, and make sureMemoryis turned on. (You’ll need to sign up for the Pro, Max, Team, or Enterprise plan to enable this feature.) Then, start a new conversation and use a prompt like, “Here’s some important context I’d like you to remember. Update your memory about me with this.” Then paste your information or summaries directly into the chat. For exported chat files, don’t paste raw logs. Instead, prompt Claude with something like: “Review this and summarize my key preferences.” We also recommend taking a moment to verify with Claude that your information has been saved accurately. You can always update your preferences as they change. To make a complete break from ChatGPT, simply canceling your subscription isn’t enough to remove your data. Here’s what to do:

6 months ago

View

Anthropic’s Claude reports widespread outage

Anthropic’s Claude reports widespread outage

Anthropic experienced widespread disruptions on Monday morning, with thousands of users reporting problems accessing Claude services. The outage seems to be affecting Claude.ai as well as Claude Code, though the company said the Claude API is working as intended. Most users experience the error when attempting to log in, as in the screenshot below. “The issues we are seeing are related to Claude.ai and with the login/logout paths,” the company’sstatus pagereads. Anthropic has not yet detailed what caused the outage, though the company said it has identified an issue and is implementing a fix. The disruption follows an influx of users to Claude, which seems to have benefited from the attention around the company’sfraught negotiationswith the Pentagon. The chatbot app rose tothe top of the App Store chartsthis weekend, overtaking archrival ChatGPT, after spending a long time below the top 20. U.S. President Donald Trump last week told federal agencies to stop using Anthropic products after a dispute over safeguards preventing the Department of Defense from using its AI models for mass domestic surveillance or fully autonomous weapons. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said he woulddesignate the company as a supply-chain threat, though Anthropicsaysit hasn’t yet received any formal notices.

6 months ago

View

ROHM Partners with Suchi Semicon to Create Early-Stage Manufacturing Base in India

ROHM Partners with Suchi Semicon to Create Early-Stage Manufacturing Base in India

ROHM will consider outsourcing back-end processes for power devices and IC products to Suchi Semicon.

6 months ago

View

India’s Supabase Block Leaves Developers and Startups Scrambling

India’s Supabase Block Leaves Developers and Startups Scrambling

India is one of the fastest-growing developer markets on Supabase, accounting for over 10% of all visits.

6 months ago

View

upGrad Integrates OpenAI Stack Across Edtech Curricula

upGrad Integrates OpenAI Stack Across Edtech Curricula

In a major push to mainstream applied AI skills, upGrad is embedding OpenAI’s latest tools across its accredited programmes.

6 months ago

View

Why NIIT is No Longer on the Street Corner

Why NIIT is No Longer on the Street Corner

Enterprise now drives 62% of NIIT’s revenue as it pivots to AI-led, outcome-linked workforce transformation.

6 months ago

View

Stay Indoors: Indian IT Issues Advisory to MEA Employees as Iran War Intensifies

Stay Indoors: Indian IT Issues Advisory to MEA Employees as Iran War Intensifies

With several hundred employees in the Middle East, the region is a growth market for Indian IT firms.

6 months ago

View

TCS Expands Zscaler Partnership with AI-Powered Workspace Experience Studio

TCS Expands Zscaler Partnership with AI-Powered Workspace Experience Studio

The new solution integrates Zero Trust security, observability and AI analytics for digital workspaces.

6 months ago

View

Groww Unveils AI Assistant for Investing, Expands Bonds and Trading Tools

Groww Unveils AI Assistant for Investing, Expands Bonds and Trading Tools

Groww also introduced a retail bond marketplace, high-frequency trading mode, F&O risk safeguards, and family wealth accounts.

6 months ago

View

AnteriorPágina 323 de 349Siguiente

Enviar tu herramienta

Submit AI Tools – The ultimate platform to discover, submit, and explore the best AI tools across various categories.Listed on codetrendy.comFeatured on ListBulb

PoweredByAI.app es un directorio de herramientas de IA que ayuda a personas, empresas y creadores a descubrir las mejores herramientas de IA para escritura, programación, diseño, productividad y más.

© 2026 , Producto de011BQ. Todos los derechos reservados.